Efficient tools should have high feed rates, high speeds and high cutting efficiency to achieve high efficiency. In the face of increasingly fierce market competition, improving production efficiency and reducing costs have become the key to the survival and development of enterprises. At this stage, the automobile manufacturing industry and its manufacturing equipment suppliers are constantly improving and adapting to competition in various aspects, among which the application of efficient tools is the most One of the important means.
The requirement for improving efficiency in the powertrain production of the automotive industry is to use as few machine tools as possible to produce as many parts as possible in a unit time. For efficient tool applications, it is to increase the metal cutting rate per unit time and reduce the machine tool. Non-cutting auxiliary time increases the starting rate of the machine. Improve the metal cutting rate per unit time of the machine tool, mainly through the high cutting speed and high feed of the high-efficiency tool; reduce the non-cutting aid of the machine tool through the reasonable and large-scale use of the combined tool with high efficiency, high quality and high stability. Time, to achieve the purpose of improving the production efficiency of the powertrain production line, which not only reduces the processing time, but also reduces the auxiliary time such as tool change, improves the production cycle and improves the production efficiency; improves the tool life and reduces the tool by optimizing the application. The frequency of tool change in production increases the starting rate of the machine tool, thereby increasing the production efficiency of the production line.
Efficient tools not only directly reduce the tooling cost of the powertrain, but also indirectly lead to a significant reduction in production costs, in line with the "lean production" principle - to maximize economic benefits with minimal investment. The leading role of high-efficiency tools in reducing the cost of powertrains is mainly reflected in reducing equipment investment, reducing the cost of parts and tools, and reducing production costs.
The price of high-efficiency tools is often relatively expensive, but sometimes cheaper tools can achieve good results, so only the right ones are the best. However, the performance of high-efficiency tools is generally much higher than that of conventional tools, and the cost of single-piece tooling for integrated parts is generally significantly reduced. For example, the same size specifications of carbide reamer and PCD reamer in the processing of aluminum alloy parts of the engine, the price of PCD reamer is generally 3 to 5 times that of cemented metal reamer, PCD reamer on the tool life is generally It is 10 times that of cemented carbide reamer, and the cost per part of the tool can be reduced by 50% or more. For existing production lines, the continuous development of tool technology enables tool costs to continue to decline while the tool performance is fully utilized. New materials and new coatings for high-efficiency tools, the tool life is often 10% to 30% higher than the original tool, and the price is generally comparable.
The efficiency of high-efficiency tools on the production line is ultimately reflected in the reduction of production costs, such as reducing the unit processing time of parts, reducing tool change time, increasing machine start-up rate, reducing tool management costs, and reducing tool inventory costs. High-efficiency tools will not produce good results if they are not used properly. According to reports, some companies purchase a large number of imported high-performance machine tools, but they use traditional low-performance tools. The performance of the machine tools only plays 10% to 20%. Due to the short tool life, the machine tools frequently stop and change tools. On the surface, the cost of the tool may be relatively low, but in terms of the production cost of the part, the cost of the part is bound to increase significantly as the depreciation cost of the device is spread over fewer parts. So the wise choice should be to apply efficient tools to maximize the machine's unit time output, thus reducing production costs as much as possible.
The requirement for improving efficiency in the powertrain production of the automotive industry is to use as few machine tools as possible to produce as many parts as possible in a unit time. For efficient tool applications, it is to increase the metal cutting rate per unit time and reduce the machine tool. Non-cutting auxiliary time increases the starting rate of the machine. Improve the metal cutting rate per unit time of the machine tool, mainly through the high cutting speed and high feed of the high-efficiency tool; reduce the non-cutting aid of the machine tool through the reasonable and large-scale use of the combined tool with high efficiency, high quality and high stability. Time, to achieve the purpose of improving the production efficiency of the powertrain production line, which not only reduces the processing time, but also reduces the auxiliary time such as tool change, improves the production cycle and improves the production efficiency; improves the tool life and reduces the tool by optimizing the application. The frequency of tool change in production increases the starting rate of the machine tool, thereby increasing the production efficiency of the production line.
Efficient tools not only directly reduce the tooling cost of the powertrain, but also indirectly lead to a significant reduction in production costs, in line with the "lean production" principle - to maximize economic benefits with minimal investment. The leading role of high-efficiency tools in reducing the cost of powertrains is mainly reflected in reducing equipment investment, reducing the cost of parts and tools, and reducing production costs.
The price of high-efficiency tools is often relatively expensive, but sometimes cheaper tools can achieve good results, so only the right ones are the best. However, the performance of high-efficiency tools is generally much higher than that of conventional tools, and the cost of single-piece tooling for integrated parts is generally significantly reduced. For example, the same size specifications of carbide reamer and PCD reamer in the processing of aluminum alloy parts of the engine, the price of PCD reamer is generally 3 to 5 times that of cemented metal reamer, PCD reamer on the tool life is generally It is 10 times that of cemented carbide reamer, and the cost per part of the tool can be reduced by 50% or more. For existing production lines, the continuous development of tool technology enables tool costs to continue to decline while the tool performance is fully utilized. New materials and new coatings for high-efficiency tools, the tool life is often 10% to 30% higher than the original tool, and the price is generally comparable.
The efficiency of high-efficiency tools on the production line is ultimately reflected in the reduction of production costs, such as reducing the unit processing time of parts, reducing tool change time, increasing machine start-up rate, reducing tool management costs, and reducing tool inventory costs. High-efficiency tools will not produce good results if they are not used properly. According to reports, some companies purchase a large number of imported high-performance machine tools, but they use traditional low-performance tools. The performance of the machine tools only plays 10% to 20%. Due to the short tool life, the machine tools frequently stop and change tools. On the surface, the cost of the tool may be relatively low, but in terms of the production cost of the part, the cost of the part is bound to increase significantly as the depreciation cost of the device is spread over fewer parts. So the wise choice should be to apply efficient tools to maximize the machine's unit time output, thus reducing production costs as much as possible.
ZHONGSHAN G-LIGHTS LIGHTING CO., LTD. , https://www.glightsled.com